Skip to main content

France: Minors banned to wear Hijab.

France has just passed a law to ban hijab for minors (person who are aged less than 18 years old). France had already banned the wearing of hijabs in public schools since 2004. We can see that someone is obsessed by the hijab. It is to be noted that France proudly say that they are a secular state. This law to restrict minors from wearing hijabs has just been passed. 

With respect to the bill; French Senator, Christian Bilhac said:

"To what extent can a secular state tolerate that children display religious signs in full view of everyone? It is not up to parents to impose dogma on children. It is essential that there are protective spaces for them and a pathway to emancipation."

The bill has been justified by mainly 2 points which are:

1. Hijab signifies inferiority of women to men.                                     2. Parents should not impose religious practices on their children. 

We all know bandana (fashion style where the hair is covered with a piece of cloth) which is worn by youngsters and even fashion models. Bandana does not in any way signifies that a gender is inferior to another. 

 It is the duty of the parents to provide guidance and education (religious, academic and civic) to their children as per the family law in France. It is the duty of a married couple. 

The bill and its justifications deny rationality to Islam and the arguments are so feeble to be able to legislate such a restriction. The draconian polices of France with respect to a specific community as a secular state is not reflecting its secularism.

Maybe, France should take a leaf out of the Mauritian Constitution as the Mauritian Best Loser System is not so bad to give a voice to minorities. It is a way to give the minorities a voice in the decision making on the national level. 

France should stop legislating draconian legislation for a specific community and should start upholding its secular values. 

Yovesh Gunnoo

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The concept of consent in international arbitration.

  Introduction Arbitration is a private dispute resolution mechanism which leads to an enforceable arbitral award. A very crucial cornerstone of international arbitration is consent. In the recent years the scholars have spoken about the ‘dogma of consent’ or the ‘marginalisation’ of it which may be due to the fact that arbitration has evolved and expanded as multiparty situations involving complex jurisdictional issues which have become commonplace. While its historical role was that of an informal and bilateral dispute resolution process. There are numerous ways in which the consent can be assessed in an international arbitration agreement and these will be explored in this essay in order to determine which is the best method to assess the consent in the international arbitration agreement. I. Consent in an international arbitration agreement. The ‘consent’ is a multifaceted term which may have the significance of the expression of consent or the reaching of mutual consent. The a...

The declaration of assets act 2018.

  The declaration of assets act 2018 is one of the legislations which has been widely popular among the population. As this legislation has the duty to bring transparency to the wealth of the public figures who are mainly politicians. The assets of any Member of Parliament can be consulted on the website of ICAC.  However, this piece of legislation is not as effective as it should have been as there are loopholes which maybe have been kept deliberately. The aim of this law is to bring the assets owned by the Members of Parliament to the eyes of the population. There are numerous ways by which the politicians can escape this piece of legislation.  We should also keep in mind that the Members of Parliament will not enact an act which will endanger their power, money and influence. If we make an abstraction on the fact the ICAC is not really independent, the declaration of assets act 2018 is full of loopholes ready to be used.  The fact that trust law in Mauritius shiel...

Law and Ganja

T he world along with Mauritius is sure to be in a deep financial dilemma as a result to the lockdown imposed due to the Covid-19 pandemic. This lockdown has destroyed most businesses however there are some businesses which strived in this atmosphere. In many countries and especially in many states of the United States of America cannabis businesses have been considered to be an essential business and was allowed to operate. There have been very long queues before the lockdown was enforced  in front of the cannabis stores as those consumers believed that cannabis helped them to cope with pressure. What we should understand is why was this plant is banned and treated like a dangerous drug in Mauritius. It is mainly due to political reasons rather than health issues. The banning of this god-gifted plant is also due to racist reasons but the society is teaching us that it is banned because it is bad for health. In Mauritius, the decision to ban the cannabis is that of the Briti...